In my last post, I challenged two myths of Russia’s 1917 February Revolution which removed Tsar Nicholas II from power: that it was “spontaneous” and “leaderless”.
Over the next two posts, I’ll put forward two rather different
interpretations. Both are commonly overlooked when teaching the Russian
Revolution. Both, however, deserve serious attention.
In this first post, I’ll examine the case for the February
Revolution being a violent event. This directly challenges a common myth that
February was peaceful, especially when compared the previous outbreaks of revolutionary
unrest, such as 1905’s Bloody Sunday massacre or the 1912 Lena Goldfields
massacre.
In fact, February 1917 witnessed considerable violence. This took several forms, including killings of protestors; bloody reprisals against military officers and police; public disorder and mob justice; and iconoclasm.